Percevia Logo
EPMA

Microssonda Eletrônica

Caracterização detalhada por Microssonda Eletrônica

O que é EPMA

Uma técnica de análise avançada

Caracterização detalhada por Microssonda Eletrônica

SensibilidadeAlta
Estado da amostraVariável

What sets us apart

We don't hand over a spectrum. We hand over the interpretation.

Any lab can return peaks and numbers. Our report reads the data. Three differences define what we deliver — illustrated below with a real, anonymized case.

1

Multiple techniques, one integrated report

We don't hand back five loose reports. We cross-reference every technique's results into a single reading — each signal checked against the others — to reach an answer, not a pile of data.

  • Contamination investigation — identifying and tracing the source of a foreign species.
  • Performance degradation — explaining why a batch behaves outside expectations.
  • New supplier validation — proving equivalence before switching.
Analytical convergence · real caseAnalyzing 5 techniques…
FTIRInfrared spectroscopy
Equivalent
FT-RamanRaman scattering
Equivalent
XRDX-ray diffraction
analyzing…
XRFX-ray fluorescence
analyzing…
¹³C NMRSolid-state magnetic resonance
analyzing…

3 LDPE batches · 4 techniques converge, NMR reveals the difference

4. Experimental justification

In semicrystalline polymer systems, thermomechanical processing variables influence chain conformational dynamics¹. Solid-state NMR resolves chemical environments at the nanometer scale², sensitive to changes not detectable by XRD or FTIR³.

References
1Muller et al. (2015). Polymer Testing, 45, 112–120.
2Schmidt-Rohr & Spiess (1994). Multidimensional Solid-State NMR.
3Korbi et al. (2025). J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 142, e5531.
2

Technical justification anchored in the literature

Every technique choice and every inference in the report is backed by peer-reviewed literature — with citations in the text. The conclusion isn't loose opinion: it's a traceable argument, defensible in an audit and in front of the client.

  • Numbered citations linking claim to source
  • Official standards and methods referenced per analyte
  • Auditable reasoning end to end
3

Conclusion and expert opinion

The report closes with a clear position, signed by the Principal Investigator: what the data shows, what can't yet be claimed, and the next step. It includes an honest caveat on the limits of inference — what separates a technical opinion from a guess.

  • Explicit technical position, not just results
  • Inference limits declared honestly
  • Next-step recommendation signed by the P.I.
8. Conclusions

Four techniques confirmed equivalence; only the solid-state NMR revealed the subtle conformational change not distinguishable by conventional QC — a molecular signature consistent with the atypical filtration behavior.

Without the industrial line's parameters, no direct causal correlation can be established — a complementary step is recommended for elucidation.

Dr. ██████████Principal Investigator · CRQ 381965
Signed

See the full interpretation

The sample report PDF shows the complete reasoning — signal attribution, discarded hypotheses, regulatory assessment, and a recommendation signed by the P.I. This is how we read your result.

We use your contact only to send the material and follow up about analytical services. No spam.

Aplicações de mercado

Onde a EPMA entrega resultados

Market Applications

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA)

What is Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) and how does it differ from SEM-EDS?

EPMA is a quantitative elemental microanalysis technique that uses a focused electron beam, like SEM, but relies primarily on wavelength-dispersive spectrometers (WDS) instead of, or alongside, energy-dispersive detectors. WDS separates X-ray wavelengths with much higher spectral resolution than EDS, giving more accurate quantification and lower detection limits, particularly for light elements and elements present at low, trace-level concentrations.

How accurate is EPMA for quantitative elemental analysis compared to EDS?

Because WDS spectrometers have narrower peak widths and less spectral overlap than EDS detectors, EPMA typically achieves better quantitative accuracy and can resolve elements whose X-ray peaks would overlap and be misidentified or misquantified on an EDS system — making it the standard choice when precise, defensible elemental concentrations are required rather than a qualitative estimate.

What sample preparation does EPMA require?

EPMA generally requires a flat, polished, and electrically conductive (or conductively coated) sample surface, similar to SEM, since accurate quantification depends on a well-defined, planar analysis point. Sample geometry and surface finish are confirmed before analysis to ensure quantitative results are reliable.

Can EPMA analyze specific points, lines, or full elemental maps?

Yes — EPMA supports point analysis for precise quantification at a single location, line scans across a feature such as a coating or interface, and full compositional mapping across a region, allowing elemental distribution to be visualized as well as quantified.

What kinds of materials questions is EPMA best suited to answer?

EPMA is particularly well suited to questions requiring precise, quantitative elemental composition at a specific microscopic location — such as confirming trace-element content, characterizing compositional gradients across an interface or coating, or verifying stoichiometry — where EDS's faster but lower-precision results are not sufficient.

Vamos conversar

Precisa de uma análise por EPMA?

Compartilhe seu desafio analítico e a nossa equipe define o método, o preparo de amostra e o escopo do relatório.

Solicitar orçamento →